From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:47:22 -0600 From: EBo To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> In-Reply-To: References: <2bca08f7e5b22db500c54deb4b58bc0c@swcp.com> Message-ID: <51a0fc4b4bb26e2894cc078f681b2bd2@swcp.com> User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [9fans] naming conventions Topicbox-Message-UUID: 332117ce-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > your shell is broken. [0-9] are perfectly valid anywhere in a unix file > name. does bash completion work for you on *anything*? Or does it get confused thinking that you are specifying a previous command (!### in the history)? Yes, a file/script named [0-9]* is valid, but still breaks things. Maybe there is some trick to get around it that I do not knwo about, but the big issues where those that the editor raised. EBo --