From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <520A1F6F.8030604@Gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 07:58:39 -0400
From: Devyn Collier Johnson <devyncjohnson@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
References: <52096C35.5070805@Gmail.com>
	<5e328d31c29d3575f5e363335d9d6a93@coraid.com>
	<52098D6C.5070904@Gmail.com>
	<161EA096-2077-41E2-B28E-EE811E15884C@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <161EA096-2077-41E2-B28E-EE811E15884C@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Python3 for Plan9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 70ca2e74-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


On 08/12/2013 10:12 PM, Matthew Veety wrote:
> No it is. Just use the compilers for the other arch.
>
> On Aug 12, 2013, at 21:35, Devyn Collier Johnson <devyncjohnson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 08/12/2013 07:23 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>>> On Mon Aug 12 19:15:36 EDT 2013, devyncjohnson@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Aloha Plan9 fans!
>>>>
>>>>      I am new to Plan9 and I plan to use it for robotics. However, I am
>>>> unable to find a Python3 interpreter that would run on a Plan9 system on
>>>> an ARM system. Does such a package exist?
>>> not out o the box, but jas' python port on bitbucket is close.  we haven't
>>> tried out python 3 yet, and we've been ignoring arm but we are following
>>> the tip, so python 3 might just work on 386/amd64.
>>>
>>> i- erik
>> Thanks anyway. I am new to cross compiling, so I assume it is not as easy as downloading the source code and compiling?
>>
>> Mahalo,
>>
>> DevynCJohnson@Gmail.com
>>

Thanks! I will try that sometime.

Mahalo,

DCJ