From: Carsten Kunze <carsten.kunze@arcor.de>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] Many bugs in eqn(1)
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:31:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <532009206.1377710.1407936717779.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail06.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOEdRO0n5+e=4Li+Pcr7ZUyacEeZYFFAkN+MStW806a+v68Stw@mail.gmail.com>
> Still I don't get what you mean. In that message we say
> 1) quality of TeX typesetting is better,
> 2) the way the equation is written (the syntax) in eqn feels
> better to me.
Ok, I got that wrong.
> Just to be sure. I don't mean readability of documents to be typeset.
> I mean the source code of the whole system. I.e., in the case of LaTeX,
> the readability/understanding/hackability of the macros' definitions.
I got that wrong too...
And thank you for the advice regarding gv(1) and printed output. I had
not expected a difference there. With printed output I have no errors
with DWB (except the TAB). (With P9P there is still the root sign shift.)
Carsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-13 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-13 10:57 Carsten Kunze
2014-08-13 11:34 ` Rudolf Sykora
2014-08-13 12:16 ` Carsten Kunze
2014-08-13 13:13 ` Rudolf Sykora
2014-08-13 13:46 ` tlaronde
2014-08-13 13:31 ` Carsten Kunze [this message]
2014-08-13 18:11 ` Steve Simon
2014-08-13 18:47 ` Carsten Kunze
2014-08-13 19:37 ` Steve Simon
2014-08-13 20:09 ` Carsten Kunze
2014-08-14 6:53 ` Steve Simon
2014-08-14 15:01 ` erik quanstrom
[not found] <1209878384.1371392.1407919054269.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail06.arcor-online.net>
2014-08-13 9:52 ` Rudolf Sykora
2014-08-13 10:30 ` cam
2014-08-13 10:43 ` tlaronde
2014-08-13 12:22 ` Carsten Kunze
2014-08-13 13:36 ` tlaronde
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-08-12 15:41 Carsten Kunze
2014-08-12 20:46 ` Steve Simon
2014-08-12 21:02 ` Carsten Kunze
2014-08-12 21:08 ` Steve Simon
2014-08-13 7:56 ` Rudolf Sykora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=532009206.1377710.1407936717779.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail06.arcor-online.net \
--to=carsten.kunze@arcor.de \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).