Re: [9fans] 9atom usb image

[Adriano Verardo <adriano.verardo@mail.com>]

erik quanstrom ha scritto:
> thanks, i'll look into this.
>
> - erik
>
As i wrote in a previous mail,  I tried this procedure:
(pcbox is a working Atom/fossil, using the key to install on dell1).

download usbinstamd64.bz2, load the usb key
pcbox% usbsd
pcbox% disk/kfs -f /dev/sdu0/fs
pcbox% mount /srv/kfs /n/k
pcbox% du -a /n/k > /tmp/du_before
pcbox% disk/kfscmd check    # Only one kfs on pcbox
   ...
   ...   3005 free blocks
...
pcbox%

unmount the key from pcbox, use it to install dell1 ...
when the compilation stops, remove the key from dell1 and re-mount it
on pcbox

pcbox% usbsd
pcbox% disk/kfs -f /dev/sdu0/fs
pcbox% mount /srv/kfs /n/k
pcbox% du -a /n/k > /tmp/du_after
pcbox% disk/kfscmd check
   ...
   ...   0 free blocks
   ...
pcbox%
pcbox% wc /tmp/du_before /tmp/du_after
pcbox% diff /tmp/du_before /tmp/du_after

Looking at the diff output it seems that the compiled executables
are installed on the key instead of the target hdd.

This makes me think to a damned typo in a "bind" somewhere.

adriano