From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:44:40 -0400
To: lucio@proxima.alt.za, 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <53429cd04addf24119c9448525414169@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <bd76be9c96045c18220b2ab9b9709c60@proxima.alt.za>
References: <bd76be9c96045c18220b2ab9b9709c60@proxima.alt.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] SSHv2
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7270c766-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri Mar 30 09:56:24 EDT 2012, lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote:
> > contrib/install quanstro/nfactotum.  move your old factotum out of the way
> > first.
>
> Is it safe to use the new factotum as a kernel module?  Is it standard
> in 9atom?

if you mean, is it safe to build into /boot,  the answers are yes.  and yes.

we run this version of factotum on our authentication server.

- erik