From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 13:48:25 -0400
From: jake@9srv.net
Message-ID: <5389b22f38333b364b6a66fd9560603b@9srv.net>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikjKF4LkSNac36dQZgd6DLTUMkr-Inwsp3L3Iyq@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4C028B75.8080701@bouyapop.org>
	<520680.8420.qm@web83905.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
	<AANLkTim8OnsuqJf3xbJsnjQKg4-in78cAvNt5rXXVka-@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikjKF4LkSNac36dQZgd6DLTUMkr-Inwsp3L3Iyq@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] crashing 9vx
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2de1641c-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> So can we sum up the 9vx state?
>
> Here's my summary:
> tinycore, 2.6.32, gcc 4.4.3
> 1. pretty easy to blow up with an hget of the plan 9 iso on SMP, -O3
> 2. lotsafiles *sometimes* fails, other times runs with no trouble on SMP, -O3
> 3. rebuild without -O3, and it is quite solid
May I ask why you're using -O3? -O3 turns on a scary amount of optimizations,
could that be the problem?