From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <53C72253.5080606@robinlea.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 08:09:39 +0700 From: john francis lee User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> References: <2cd3d3a808e9d61fc89f920f0954745f@eonet.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] file server speed Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0493159e-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Not Found The resource could not be found. WSGI Server On 07/17/2014 07:29 AM, Steven Stallion wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 6:15 PM, wrote: >>> That was in an office environment. At home I use >>> fossil+(plan9port)venti running on linux-based NAS. >> >> Do you use wireless LAN? >> If so you also need wireless bridge? >> The combination of NAS and venti sounds like charm, >> because the snmallest config is two machines. >> >> How about the power-eating of that machine? >> Recent low-power machine can do that task? > > I've used ReadyNAS appliances at home for almost 10 years. The current > product line is made up of low-power Atoms. I'm running a RAID5 across > 4 500G enterprise SATA drives (that should indicate how old this unit > is pretty well...) I have a wired network primarily in the rack in the > office at home - I absolutely would not use wireless to connect fossil > to venti (fossil does *not* cope well with the connection to venti > dropping). > > I switched over to fossil on the ReadyNAS a little over a year ago and > have had really good luck; not a single crash. Performance has also > been very good. > > It just so happens I wrote a README at the time since it was > non-obvious how to set it up correctly: > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/102312978/FOSSIL > > Cheers, > > Steve > -- John Francis Lee Thanon Sanam Gila, Ban Fa Sai 79/151 Moo 22 T. Ropwieng Mueang Chiangrai 57000 Thailand