From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <549095E4.2010407@gr13.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:28:20 +0100
From: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <enrico.weigelt@gr13.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@9fans.net
References: <CAOEdRO3Ns6bNydh1yyQTgiJ2Y_xJf+20ErOgCe6aX6Ko1rmH4A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOEdRO3Ns6bNydh1yyQTgiJ2Y_xJf+20ErOgCe6aX6Ko1rmH4A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] advice? fossil+venti (p9),
 vbackup+venti (p9p) vs. some other means of backup
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 36f3ad6e-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 11.12.2014 11:50, Rudolf Sykora wrote:

> Does anybody rely on a backup scheme using, say,
> vbackup+venti on linux? Does it work well, or would
> you recomment other means of doing a backup?

haven't used it for backup, I (many years ago) built an video
hosting platform ontop of venti. since then I've still got an
self-replicating venti cluster on my 2do list, but never actually
found the time to do implement it.


cu
--
Enrico Weigelt,
metux IT consulting
+49-151-27565287