9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [9fans] Ad link
@ 2005-03-23 17:04 Brantley Coile
  2005-03-24  8:58 ` Matthias Wenzel
  2005-03-24 13:45 ` vdharani
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Brantley Coile @ 2005-03-23 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs

>> vdharani was asking about our ad.  Here's the link.

http://www.coraid.com/documents/WhyBuyMoreServers.pdf

   Brantley



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] Ad link
  2005-03-24 13:45 ` vdharani
@ 2005-03-24  8:37   ` Devon H. O'Dell 
  2005-03-24 15:03   ` Brantley Coile
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Devon H. O'Dell  @ 2005-03-24  8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1126 bytes --]

On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 07:45:00AM -0600, vdharani@infernopark.com wrote:
> Brantley,
> 
> >>> vdharani was asking about our ad.  Here's the link.
> >
> > http://www.coraid.com/documents/WhyBuyMoreServers.pdf
> 
> thanks for the document. the product is really interesting. for one of our
> products in my previous company we were looking for such a server.
> 
> btw, can you or someone give an approximate price of the product for a
> bare minimum configuration? i am wondering whether a home plan9 user can
> afford it at all? the rack mount slightly scares me about 1. price, and 2.
> noise.
> 
> thanks
> dharani

FWIW, Offmyserver sells these kinds of things too, though ours
doesn't work over ethernet (it's just a standard fiber channel
slash SCSI thing) and since I don't do hardware stuff there, I
don't know if the price is accurate (the prices on the site are
usually much higher than we quote by email / phone). The product
we sell starts at $6,000. I don't know if that includes disks. I
should probably ask, shouldn't I? :)

I'll also ask if we have this kind of NAS stuff.

--Devon

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 194 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] Ad link
  2005-03-23 17:04 [9fans] Ad link Brantley Coile
@ 2005-03-24  8:58 ` Matthias Wenzel
  2005-03-24 10:51   ` Charles Forsyth
  2005-03-24 13:45 ` vdharani
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Wenzel @ 2005-03-24  8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs

Brantley Coile wrote:
> http://www.coraid.com/documents/WhyBuyMoreServers.pdf

A similar product was introduced by a japanese company called Buffalo
recently at the CeBIT fair: Model HD-H1.OTGL/R5, ~900 Euros, 4 disks, 1
Terabyte in RAID0/1/5, Gigabit eth, linux-based, no ATAoE but that
should be subject to SW.

http://www.buffalotech.com/products/storage.php
babelfished news-URL:
http://world.altavista.com/babelfish/trurl_pagecontent?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.heise.de%2Fnewsticker%2Fmeldung%2F57443&lp=de_en

Matthias


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] Ad link
  2005-03-24  8:58 ` Matthias Wenzel
@ 2005-03-24 10:51   ` Charles Forsyth
  2005-03-24 15:17     ` Brantley Coile
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Charles Forsyth @ 2005-03-24 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

the devices people have mentioned so far are not,
in fact, similar to coraid's
if you read the white paper(s) on the coraid web site,
you should begin to appreciate the difference


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] Ad link
  2005-03-23 17:04 [9fans] Ad link Brantley Coile
  2005-03-24  8:58 ` Matthias Wenzel
@ 2005-03-24 13:45 ` vdharani
  2005-03-24  8:37   ` Devon H. O'Dell 
  2005-03-24 15:03   ` Brantley Coile
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: vdharani @ 2005-03-24 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs

Brantley,

>>> vdharani was asking about our ad.  Here's the link.
>
> http://www.coraid.com/documents/WhyBuyMoreServers.pdf

thanks for the document. the product is really interesting. for one of our
products in my previous company we were looking for such a server.

btw, can you or someone give an approximate price of the product for a
bare minimum configuration? i am wondering whether a home plan9 user can
afford it at all? the rack mount slightly scares me about 1. price, and 2.
noise.

thanks
dharani



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] Ad link
  2005-03-24 13:45 ` vdharani
  2005-03-24  8:37   ` Devon H. O'Dell 
@ 2005-03-24 15:03   ` Brantley Coile
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Brantley Coile @ 2005-03-24 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs

We have a small eval board, a bare printed circuit board, that
a single blade can plug into that allows people to play with
a single drive.  We list that for $285 including the blade.
I'll get you one for $150.  (A dharani only price)

   Brantley

On Mar 24, 2005, at 8:45 AM, vdharani@infernopark.com wrote:

> Brantley,
>
>>>> vdharani was asking about our ad.  Here's the link.
>>
>> http://www.coraid.com/documents/WhyBuyMoreServers.pdf
>
> thanks for the document. the product is really interesting. for one of
> our
> products in my previous company we were looking for such a server.
>
> btw, can you or someone give an approximate price of the product for a
> bare minimum configuration? i am wondering whether a home plan9 user
> can
> afford it at all? the rack mount slightly scares me about 1. price,
> and 2.
> noise.
>
> thanks
> dharani
>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] Ad link
  2005-03-24 10:51   ` Charles Forsyth
@ 2005-03-24 15:17     ` Brantley Coile
  2005-03-25  8:59       ` vdharani
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Brantley Coile @ 2005-03-24 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs

And here's a quick summary of the difference.

EtherDrive storage blades use AoE the talk to block storage.
They are not nas boxes.
They are like sans only each drive can be seen on the network.
Each blade is a complete server with its own Ethernet interface.
The shelf has no common equipment; just power supply and a couple of
fans.
Blades can be raided across any number of shelves; you can
stripe 30 blades together if you wish while the shelf only
holds 10 blades.
You never have to spill a file system like using nas boxes;
just keep adding shelves and making your file system bigger.

I don't want to get into a commercial for EtherDrive storage blades,
so you might want to read the white paper.

On Mar 24, 2005, at 5:51 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote:

> the devices people have mentioned so far are not,
> in fact, similar to coraid's
> if you read the white paper(s) on the coraid web site,
> you should begin to appreciate the difference
>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] Ad link
  2005-03-24 15:17     ` Brantley Coile
@ 2005-03-25  8:59       ` vdharani
  2005-03-25 15:25         ` Brantley Coile
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: vdharani @ 2005-03-25  8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs

> And here's a quick summary of the difference.
>
> EtherDrive storage blades use AoE the talk to block storage.
> They are not nas boxes.
> They are like sans only each drive can be seen on the network.
> Each blade is a complete server with its own Ethernet interface.
> The shelf has no common equipment; just power supply and a couple of
> fans.
> Blades can be raided across any number of shelves; you can
> stripe 30 blades together if you wish while the shelf only
> holds 10 blades.
> You never have to spill a file system like using nas boxes;
> just keep adding shelves and making your file system bigger.
>
> I don't want to get into a commercial for EtherDrive storage blades,
> so you might want to read the white paper.

any reason why it is not AoIP (i mean ATA over IP)? that way it would be
even more flexible. i am sure you have a reason behind but would like to
know why you chose not to use ip. i think a skinny IP/UDP is a good choice
too. i guess it is time to read the coraid paper!

thanks
dharani



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] Ad link
  2005-03-25  8:59       ` vdharani
@ 2005-03-25 15:25         ` Brantley Coile
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Brantley Coile @ 2005-03-25 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs

We started with the idea to just do what was needed; do one thing
well, that sort of thinking.  We wanted to connect disks to local
systems so we just needed data link layer, not network layer.
We can still forward AoE thru tunnels if required and we don't
have to manage IP address spaces.  In fact, there is no configuration
for the blades at all, just plug them in.  You do have to set an address
for each shelf with dip switches.

On Mar 25, 2005, at 3:59 AM, vdharani@infernopark.com wrote:

> any reason why it is not AoIP (i mean ATA over IP)? that way it would
> be
> even more flexible. i am sure you have a reason behind but would like
> to
> know why you chose not to use ip. i think a skinny IP/UDP is a good
> choice
> too. i guess it is time to read the coraid paper!



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] Ad link
  2005-03-26  0:00           ` geoff
@ 2005-03-26  0:19             ` Russ Cox
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Russ Cox @ 2005-03-26  0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs

> I think Russ was joking, but accessing a WORM jukebox via ATA would

i was joking, but jmk points out that woe might
be an appropriate acronym nonetheless.

russ


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] Ad link
  2005-03-25 15:34         ` Brantley Coile
@ 2005-03-26  0:00           ` geoff
  2005-03-26  0:19             ` Russ Cox
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: geoff @ 2005-03-26  0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 401 bytes --]

I think Russ was joking, but accessing a WORM jukebox via ATA would
presumably require ATAPI, to get access to the SCSI CCS or MMC command
set, whatever it's called (the one that controls jukeboxes).  I've
never heard of an ATA(PI) WORM jukebox and it wouldn't help with
existing SCSI WORM jukeboxes, such as mine.

In any event, SCSI, ATA and AoE should all be able to coexist in one
kernel.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2881 bytes --]

From: Brantley Coile <brantley@coraid.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>, Russ Cox <russcox@gmail.com>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [9fans] Ad link
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 10:34:20 -0500
Message-ID: <98ed931981d9d952e885f91395286183@coraid.com>

What would that be like?
   Brantley

On Mar 24, 2005, at 5:47 PM, Russ Cox wrote:

>> so should geoff port ken's file server to coraid :-)
>
> first coraid has to add worm over ethernet.
>
> russ
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] Ad link
  2005-03-24 22:47       ` Russ Cox
@ 2005-03-25 15:34         ` Brantley Coile
  2005-03-26  0:00           ` geoff
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Brantley Coile @ 2005-03-25 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs, Russ Cox

What would that be like?
   Brantley

On Mar 24, 2005, at 5:47 PM, Russ Cox wrote:

>> so should geoff port ken's file server to coraid :-)
>
> first coraid has to add worm over ethernet.
>
> russ
>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] Ad link
  2005-03-25  8:51 ` Fwd: " vdharani
@ 2005-03-25 15:27   ` Brantley Coile
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Brantley Coile @ 2005-03-25 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs

No limits within reason.  I'll have a hard time if someone orders
30 shelves!!  Jim will kill me! :)

You can have more than 1 eval at that price.

I just hate expensive eval boards!  We are working on a new
board with a Cirrus part and they want $2,500 for the eval
card, that is similar to the card that Ron is using  that costs $150.
I want to sell stuff in a way that I would want to buy it.

  Brantley

On Mar 25, 2005, at 3:51 AM, vdharani@infernopark.com wrote:

>>> We have a small eval board, a bare printed circuit board, that
>>> a single blade can plug into that allows people to play with
>>> a single drive.  We list that for $285 including the blade.
>>> I'll get you one for $150.
> oh, thank you. thats affordable. can i get a couple of boards or limit
> 1?
>
>> Actually I meant to say, 9fans only price.
>> I'll also give really good prices for the shelf with
>> 10 blades as well.  We sell these for $2,495 but I'll sell one to
>> 9fans folk at the `we don't make any money' price of $1,500.
> this is not in my range, but can you give a rain check? when i need and
> can afford, sure i would buy one.
>
> and again, this is limit 1?
>
> thanks again,
> dharani
>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-26  0:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-23 17:04 [9fans] Ad link Brantley Coile
2005-03-24  8:58 ` Matthias Wenzel
2005-03-24 10:51   ` Charles Forsyth
2005-03-24 15:17     ` Brantley Coile
2005-03-25  8:59       ` vdharani
2005-03-25 15:25         ` Brantley Coile
2005-03-24 13:45 ` vdharani
2005-03-24  8:37   ` Devon H. O'Dell 
2005-03-24 15:03   ` Brantley Coile
2005-03-24 15:08 Fwd: " Brantley Coile
2005-03-24 15:54 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-03-24 21:15   ` Sam
2005-03-24 22:31     ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-03-24 22:47       ` Russ Cox
2005-03-25 15:34         ` Brantley Coile
2005-03-26  0:00           ` geoff
2005-03-26  0:19             ` Russ Cox
2005-03-25  8:51 ` Fwd: " vdharani
2005-03-25 15:27   ` Brantley Coile

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).