9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] gsoc2010 + plan9
Date: Thu,  4 Mar 2010 21:25:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55b95c2fcc02ec9910e47fd33c367299@ladd.quanstro.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <408e17f9aeb6335970650379e8d7d401@plan9.bell-labs.com>

On Thu Mar  4 17:15:19 EST 2010, David.Eckhardt@cs.cmu.edu wrote:
> > for example, there are a number of 10/100 chipsets that have
> > good documentation that's under 100 pages.  complete with
> > (oh, my) a theory of operation.
>
> Such as?

and

On Thu Mar  4 20:28:36 EST 2010, geoff@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
> It's not worth supporting any new 10Mb ethernet controllers,
> and new 100Mb ones are borderline.

for the pc architechture, this is certianly true.  i would even bias
development toward 10 and 40gbe.

but for other platforms, i think 10/100 chipsets make a lot of sense
today.  10/100 is great for appliance-ish applications/
for example, this is a very interesting bit of hardware
(sorry, ron, mips, not arm)

	http://www.ubiquitistore.com/ls2

an ethernet driver is here

	https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/target/linux/atheros/patches-2.6.33/110-ar2313_ethernet.patch?rev=19906

it's a mere 1200 lines, which is just trivial in the linux world so if one
were to scare up documentation, it might be quite a dream to
program.

there were a few others i stumbled on recently.  i recall reading
the datasheets for a few spi-based chipsets that looked pretty clean.
(obviously 10mbps.)

- erik



  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-05  2:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-03 23:09 Tim Newsham
2010-03-03 23:40 ` David Leimbach
2010-03-04  1:35   ` Venkatesh Srinivas
2010-03-04 17:39 ` Balwinder S Dheeman
2010-03-04 18:04   ` erik quanstrom
2010-03-05 15:39     ` Balwinder S Dheeman
2010-03-04 18:43   ` Chad Brown
2010-03-04 19:05     ` erik quanstrom
2010-03-04 21:13       ` ron minnich
2010-03-04 21:45         ` Patrick Kelly
2010-03-05  2:55           ` erik quanstrom
2010-03-05 12:13         ` Georg Lehner
2010-03-05  1:27   ` geoff
2010-03-05  2:25     ` erik quanstrom [this message]
2010-03-08 10:57     ` Balwinder S Dheeman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55b95c2fcc02ec9910e47fd33c367299@ladd.quanstro.net \
    --to=quanstro@quanstro.net \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).