From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu,  4 Mar 2010 21:25:50 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <55b95c2fcc02ec9910e47fd33c367299@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <408e17f9aeb6335970650379e8d7d401@plan9.bell-labs.com>
References: <408e17f9aeb6335970650379e8d7d401@plan9.bell-labs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] gsoc2010 + plan9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e04dcda8-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu Mar  4 17:15:19 EST 2010, David.Eckhardt@cs.cmu.edu wrote:
> > for example, there are a number of 10/100 chipsets that have
> > good documentation that's under 100 pages.  complete with
> > (oh, my) a theory of operation.
>
> Such as?

and

On Thu Mar  4 20:28:36 EST 2010, geoff@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
> It's not worth supporting any new 10Mb ethernet controllers,
> and new 100Mb ones are borderline.

for the pc architechture, this is certianly true.  i would even bias
development toward 10 and 40gbe.

but for other platforms, i think 10/100 chipsets make a lot of sense
today.  10/100 is great for appliance-ish applications/
for example, this is a very interesting bit of hardware
(sorry, ron, mips, not arm)

	http://www.ubiquitistore.com/ls2

an ethernet driver is here

	https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/target/linux/atheros/patches-2.6.33/110-ar2313_ethernet.patch?rev=19906

it's a mere 1200 lines, which is just trivial in the linux world so if one
were to scare up documentation, it might be quite a dream to
program.

there were a few others i stumbled on recently.  i recall reading
the datasheets for a few spi-based chipsets that looked pretty clean.
(obviously 10mbps.)

- erik