From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
References: <07E85E8F-D9EC-471E-B123-3CC865200D6B@bitblocks.com>
From: Matthew Veety <mveety@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <07E85E8F-D9EC-471E-B123-3CC865200D6B@bitblocks.com>
Message-Id: <56EA26F3-7E87-40F7-8329-46E8B9919851@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:44:49 -0400
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [9fans] Scheme
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2e58a0a2-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025



On Mar 18, 2013, at 14:27, Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> wrote:

> Can we get back to plan9?
>=20
> I've updated my bitbucket repo of s9fes Scheme to its author's latest vers=
ion. s9, the scheme interpreter, works fine but bundled scheme programs don'=
t yet work due to their unix dependencies. The low level p9 interface is the=
 same as before. I have tested it on x86 and arm. If anyone is interested in=
 scheme hacking, there are some fun little projects: a GUI library, a librar=
y to build scheme based file servers, etc. A bigger project is to add a prop=
er code generator.
>=20
> Chibi scheme also works on p9 but it is a moving target and it has more un=
ix & shared lib dependencies. And I haven't ported my p9 support to it.

I'm very interested in this. Do you have a link to your bitbucket?