From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5d375e920908281640n2d2d7e0ey6ba3fd82ce57de1c@mail.gmail.com> References: <6e4c5e765790b59c3615d11de841cf83@quanstro.net> <4A97D27F.3040508@maht0x0r.net> <5d375e920908281640n2d2d7e0ey6ba3fd82ce57de1c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 01:54:30 +0200 Message-ID: <56a297000908281654w731008fakc24851e2e95f1b50@mail.gmail.com> From: Noah Evans To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [9fans] new 9atom.iso Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5badb0e0-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 One way of phrasing it: "I usually need 9fat to choose which kernel I'm going to use depending on the circumstances, is there anyway that I could reincorporate 9fat or something like it? What do I need to do to make it possible?" another way: "You losers never do anything right, where's my 9fat?" Which is more productive? On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Uriel wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Iruata Souza wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:50 AM, matt wrote: >>> FIGHT >>> >> >> i fought myself. >> pbs32 (9null's pbs) now works with 9fat without caring about it. >> it loops reading a block and checking for the a.out(8) signature. if >> the 9pcload is on 9fat, not a problem anymore. > > Wonderful! > > Seems that everyone won the fight in the end. > > Perhaps fighting is not as useless as some make it? > > Peace > > uriel > >