From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@labs.coraid.com>
Date: Mon,  8 Mar 2010 11:02:40 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <57a2ba17803f9864a2050865a0fdb991@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <3e1162e61003080745p5d53f822x87815f3fc4ef3748@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20100224185312.GA1892@zoidberg.hsd1.mi.comcast.net>
	<bc6b82d8d346e2988ea7c7391126f7c4@plan9.bell-labs.com>
	<20100308154243.GA21591@knaagkever.ueber.net>
	<3e1162e61003080745p5d53f822x87815f3fc4ef3748@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] sheevaplug port available
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e430b318-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>
> I thought the flashes themselves were doing wear-leveling these days in most
> products?  That's not the case with sheevaplug?  Or am I completely
> off-base?
>

there are a lot of embedded-space flashes that don't.

- erik