From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <580ddc8b7111c39f7cd256e21b6a6508@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] permission bit of /mail/box
From: okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp
In-Reply-To: <126eb906e4893fa3ed3e192c47b1c8d3@plan9.bell-labs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:41:24 +0900
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4455fc58-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> We keep a separate file system that isn't backed up.  Many people
> here keep there /usr/xxx/tmp there,

If do so, the 'other' file system looks like "garbage" to me.
It doesn't cause any problem.., yes, I agree.
However, I feel it's not the way of Plan 9 which seaks most
elegant way to solve ones.
Then, I asked why we don't use noarchive flag in main filesystem.
The other filesystem can be used for such as spaces for database,
common to whole the system, and of course, for swap etc.

Am I thinkng wrong?

Kenji