From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sat,  1 Mar 2014 16:55:35 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <5898a072fa92e6b4c1ac1f2af517cba1@mikro.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <329d8901cc6fd72ba935ebbb2c5e2d84@felloff.net>
References: <329d8901cc6fd72ba935ebbb2c5e2d84@felloff.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] imagereclaim()
Topicbox-Message-UUID: bfb06df0-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sat Mar  1 16:51:29 EST 2014, cinap_lenrek@felloff.net wrote:
> the imagereclaim algorithm is wrong.

yes.  and so is duppage().  charles has some ideas here.

- erik