From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Wed,  7 May 2014 05:12:08 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <58a7149420c59e34fe5e5be59bb22f98@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAOw7k5jBKm+m-o21VfRBGmfDOMU29Ymta8d69LROxurS=dSGWw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOw7k5jU-_PSttSOOmgEUrWnaYHnagchigqrfZrReobks6TiJA@mail.gmail.com>
	<c6a29f141ead4f91a54ab47ec4fcd1ce@proxima.alt.za>
	<CAOw7k5jBKm+m-o21VfRBGmfDOMU29Ymta8d69LROxurS=dSGWw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] [GSOC] plan9 which arch code to use?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e04eaf18-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed May  7 04:47:05 EDT 2014, charles.forsyth@gmail.com wrote:

> On 7 May 2014 06:14, <lucio@proxima.alt.za> wrote:
>
> > The Bell Labs distribution does not seem to have a libc/amd64.  It's a
> > bit of a show stopper.  I could also be mistaken and a different amd64
> > is being looked for.
> >
>
> I did not know that. I've attached a tar file, of what I'm using.
> I'll compare it to the patches that David posted. Clearly it would help to
> push the files into sources.

alternately, the source is available on sources.9atom.org. /n/atom/plan9/...

is there a reason for "/amd64/include/gnu/*"?

- erik