From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <58c8e88cdc5afad38233c3ab4bb74344@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:01:45 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <f4d8fa40908310559k1d6a1ef1rb773dc2804b47c98@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9P/Styx: streaming / contigious reading
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5c7f8f48-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon Aug 31 09:00:33 EDT 2009, 23hiro@googlemail.com wrote:
> Why don't you use a protocol more suitable for high latencies?
>

i think the problem rather is the tradition of having one
outstanding message per fid.  as far as i can tell, 9p doesn't
have this restriction.  we just use it that way.

- erik