From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon,  4 Jul 2011 09:43:51 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <59801f3132499863167d2aca99fb8444@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <eb08eafaf7fc967ecae0a0016c499fad@quintile.net>
References: <eb08eafaf7fc967ecae0a0016c499fad@quintile.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] why not halt in x86 multicore
Topicbox-Message-UUID: fa64f8dc-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon Jul  4 09:14:10 EDT 2011, steve@quintile.net wrote:
> > so why don't you just give your plan 9 guest 1 processor, either through the vmm
> > or *ncpu, and be done with it?
>
> Too much work to port plan9 a cpu server to the mac ppc hardware... :-)
>
> An intel mac would solve many problems I agree.

i was responding to the thread on halt() and multicore.

- erik