From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <599f06db05082208056b1d15aa@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:05:47 -0500
From: Gorka guardiola <paurea@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Q: checking CD vs. iso image
In-Reply-To: <ee9e417a05082205551107a5c3@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <e1080069abea57b1f46d653312836a60@www2.mail.post.cz>
	<20050822124643.GA9528@server4.lensbuddy.com>
	<ee9e417a05082205551107a5c3@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7af07fe6-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 8/22/05, Russ Cox <russcox@gmail.com> wrote:
> You only need a "good" list if "bad" is the norm.
> If "bad" is the norm, let's address that instead.
>=20

Bad is as in badly compressed (that is easy to check for, you uncompress,
mount, diff the trees) or bad meaning a bug in a program inside the
CD?. Booting the
CD in a virtual environment may help on that, though it may be too
much of a hassle.
--=20
- curiosity sKilled the cat