From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <599f06db0603060816i7faf9f1fqc7a606665df836cb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 17:16:30 +0100 From: "Gorka guardiola" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] bug in asm.ps In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0c63ea58-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Is it different in 2a?. Anyway, I thought it first discusses 2a and then there are the differences with it in the next pages. The i386 section doesnt say anything... On 3/6/06, Russ Cox wrote: > > Oh, I understand now. You are correct. Asm.ps is wrong. > > What exactly do you think is wrong? > (And keep in mind that page 1 is explicitly > marked as a discussion of 2a.) -- - curiosity sKilled the cat