From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <599f06db0603060833i2b1a994dr3f62c9dd18800cec@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon,  6 Mar 2006 17:33:08 +0100
From: "Gorka guardiola" <paurea@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] bug in asm.ps
In-Reply-To: <59e58c74c10e9b1b37349db89db7218c@swtch.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <27ac23f8fcf4a0acb0e54d9621d9bffb@coraid.com>
	<59e58c74c10e9b1b37349db89db7218c@swtch.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0cc51af8-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I dont want to enter weird discussions. When I read asm.ps it seems to me
it implies that the automatics are ordered  local first, local n as the
memory grows. It says 0(SP) is the first, 4(SP) is the second and so on.
For me the first is the first declared in C. First as in 1st.
This is wrong taking all this assumptions.

On 3/6/06, Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com> wrote:
> > Then I don't know what the word `automatic' means for an assembler.
>
> Then I don't know what the phrase "first automatic" means for a C compile=
r.
>
> Russ
>
>


--
- curiosity sKilled the cat