From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <599f06db0611150127i7405a48bw6642ad5976f226ed@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:27:23 +0100 From: "Gorka guardiola" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Samterm up down key patch In-Reply-To: <7d3530220611142132r40f093a7yd38907d5293e2178@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <34D4933C-7C2E-4B31-A448-D630C8A699E1@orthanc.ca> <7d3530220611142057t45ce0f89nc8a20dea219b92ac@mail.gmail.com> <7d3530220611142132r40f093a7yd38907d5293e2178@mail.gmail.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: e0685b40-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 11/15/06, John Floren wrote: > > When you think about it, if it drives you nuts using the mouse because > it feels slower, I'd say it's more productive to use the keyboard. It is what you get used to. The mouse used to drive me nuts. Now the keyboard does. Anyway, when I use emacs I have to rest my fingers now and then (not joking) and that is counter-productive too. The only things I miss are macros which you can test interactively and so are faster to get right than scripts/ Edit commands in some cases. > Besides, if using keys and commands requires more higher brain > activity, I guess you could say that emacs prevents Alzhiemer's. I may go back to it when I start to feel senile. > Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn Tekelili Tekelili Nyarlotep Tekelili. -- - curiosity sKilled the cat