From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <599f06db0707311931wcaa6c3lce7b99b5ee76fef1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 22:31:22 -0400
From: "Gorka Guardiola" <paurea@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Bay Area Plan 9 Users Group Meeting (August '07)
In-Reply-To: <6fedc997d25ce6452a5eace2959f3d2b@coraid.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <599f06db0707311836n658eef99mc4a5dd79b6e9491f@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fedc997d25ce6452a5eace2959f3d2b@coraid.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 995539d4-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 7/31/07, erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com> wrote:
> > > bring friends, family, well-behaved dogs and interns, etc.
>
> there is no distributive property of adjectives over nouns except maybe
> if the adjective preceedes the whole list.  like arithmetic, except the
> results of the parser may depend on the conscience of the parser.
>
> which is good if you are friends, family or an intern.
>

With the commas as they are, etc meaning "and other things" and having
and "and" where it is, this reads (I think in a standard parser):

bring
- friends,
- family,
- well-behaved dogs and interns,
- etc.

either grouping (well-behaved dogs) and interns or well-behaved (dogs
and interns)
in a rather ambiguous way. Can we bring bad-behaved interns?.

The "and" is redundant in the presence of the "et" in the "et cetera",
unambiguously meaning
that there is a grouping or class of equivalence being defined.
Though I am not a native english speaker though, so I might be wrong.

Back to the assembler...
-- 
- curiosity sKilled the cat