From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <599f06db0709031017g5ea2f3eeu48687c54499074c6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 19:17:15 +0200 From: "Gorka Guardiola" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] plan 9 overcommits memory? In-Reply-To: <557b673255bf469340fec39ebc5ec647@csplan9.rit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <557b673255bf469340fec39ebc5ec647@csplan9.rit.edu> Topicbox-Message-UUID: b5614640-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 9/3/07, john@csplan9.rit.edu wrote: > > Also, it's broken, broken, broken on Plan 9 and nobody wants to fix it. > The upside to this is that we can just say how we don't want it anyway, > there's no conceivable reason anyone would want swap, and operating > systems with working swap suck ;) > > > John "Has a Swap Partition and Doesn't Know Why" Floren > Isn=B4t it more like John "wants somebody else to fix his swap instead of d= oing himself" Floren?. If you think something is broken, fix it instead of complaining. If noone else likes it, at least you have your problem solved... --=20 - curiosity sKilled the cat