From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <599f06db0712141932x5f66fff2t492767864fd9c657@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 04:32:00 +0100
From: "Gorka Guardiola" <paurea@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] p9p + devdraw
In-Reply-To: <20071214174210.6A5421E8C60@holo.morphisms.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20071213015515.GA30611@nibiru.local>
	<20071214174210.6A5421E8C60@holo.morphisms.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 19c2bd8a-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> > Is there any way for getting an network transparent
> > display server ?
>
> What does network-transparent mean?
>
> If it means "emit curses codes so that everything works
> inside your xterm" then sorry, that can't happen: they're
> graphical interfaces.
>
> If it means "if you're on some other machine and have
> X forwarding set up right, then a new window pops up
> on your screen" then devdraw *is* network transparent.
>
> Either way, the situation is no different than if the programs
> linked directly against the X library.
>

I may be wrong but I think he was meaning to use a window (draw
rectangle...) from
another machine like when you run rio inside a window after cpuing to
a  cpu server
and the applications there are drawing here.



-- 
- curiosity sKilled the cat