From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <599f06db0802180157t2ac529e6t53fdf1c8f7813b2f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:57:10 +0100
From: "Gorka Guardiola" <paurea@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Google search of the day
In-Reply-To: <47B5D5D6.B17D7D10@null.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <d1c554290802140951j48c8698au6675ab8870b26b0c@mail.gmail.com>
	<140e7ec30802150131u7961c91at4b9bbe08f04705f0@mail.gmail.com>
	<47B5D5D6.B17D7D10@null.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 592821f4-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Feb 18, 2008 10:48 AM, Douglas A. Gwyn <DAGwyn@null.net> wrote:
> sqweek wrote:
> > Is there a fork analog in plan 9?
>
> rfork, which is more general in that the program can specify
> in more detail which resources are to be shared and which are
> to be copied.
>

Or even better, fork(2) which is a library function enveloping rfork(2):

int
fork(void)
{
         return rfork(RFPROC|RFFDG|RFREND);
}

--
- curiosity sKilled the cat