From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <599f06db0804221305m462fdac2m4e767f9349011ebe@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:05:00 +0200 From: "Gorka Guardiola" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net> In-Reply-To: <8ccc8ba40804221212p2c430645g8317991a17605596@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1358d1ac592fcf92abafbf5d2204005f@csplan9.rit.edu> <8ccc8ba40804221212p2c430645g8317991a17605596@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [9fans] /lib/rfc Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9796bde2-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Francisco J Ballesteros wr= ote: > We had the same problem time ago and had to lower the mtu by hand. > Perhaps detecting too many retransmissions of the same packet could be > considered a hint > of this problem and try by reducing at least once the mtu. In any > case, it=B4s been > a long time since we had this problem. I even forgot about it. > I think we just got bye with setting the mtu to be some arbitrary 1480 or something instead of 1500. It was a bug in some adsl router coupled with another but which was it dropped the packet and did not reported it or the icmp got lost or something. I cannot remember it too well though either. --=20 - curiosity sKilled the cat