From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <13426df10902271442g48becc74hf3bf6cf1a83c1896@mail.gmail.com>
References: <13426df10902271442g48becc74hf3bf6cf1a83c1896@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:39:20 +0100
Message-ID: <599f06db0902271539h6c1bd709xc49245fe2bab7d72@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gorka Guardiola <paurea@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] new contest
Topicbox-Message-UUID: aa074626-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:42 PM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Beat that.
>
> ron
>
>

nm shows that printf gets changed for puts, so after taking everything
out:


int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
     printf(=A8hello darkness=A8);
}

//no includes... no defines, nothing I am paranoid about libc now


gcc -c darkness darkness.c

darkness.c: In function 'main':
darkness.c:5: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in
function 'printf'


wait, builtin??

nm darkness.o

00000000 T main
         U puts

puts?. where did that come from hmm ah builtin...

quoting some anonymous gcc developer
you are not *allowed* to modify the C library
functions unless you ask gcc for permission...

gcc -fno-builtin

gcc -please-let-me-write-my-function-please...

--=20
- curiosity sKilled the cat