From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <055fe646e2d88c0e525db62af670caa3@smgl.fr.eu.org>
References: <055fe646e2d88c0e525db62af670caa3@smgl.fr.eu.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:40:22 +0100
Message-ID: <599f06db0903151740q7432717cy6cb53d4d27b21fef@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gorka Guardiola <paurea@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] alternative port with webfs?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: bb9a35ce-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Mathieu <lejatorn@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on something that will use http requests so I figured using
> webfs instead of reinventing the wheel might be a good idea, even though
> I've been hinted on #plan9 that it's far from perfect.
> My first try was to duplicate some code from /sys/src/cmd/webfs/webget.c
> and it seemed that I couldn't get a reply from a server
> listening on a port other than 80, using that syntax for the url:
> http://host:port/path. Then I tried the same thing with webfsget
> and I also got a 'Connection refused'.

I patched this a little bit and seems to work for me. =BFDo you
have the latest version?.

--=20
- curiosity sKilled the cat