From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <3e1162e60908270951n2b16dd4by19f58ccd1a97a0ec@mail.gmail.com> <13426df10908271005x1e4196e6lbfd67c4ab78654ea@mail.gmail.com> <5d375e920908271126k1893f3e0q99065d37077621dc@mail.gmail.com> <5d375e920908271148n5ca01308qcb060286b871d222@mail.gmail.com> <13426df10908271157x534a94bbl410bbd4dd99a491b@mail.gmail.com> <5d375e920908271207k4a554940q393bb114c962bdc4@mail.gmail.com> <13426df10908271217t17b7ae8er8f52f97b222f14b6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:59:40 +0200 Message-ID: <599f06db0908280059l65af99bflf1535fd2b751e04c@mail.gmail.com> From: Gorka Guardiola To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] new 9atom.iso Topicbox-Message-UUID: 595d794c-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:14 PM, erik quanstrom wrote= : >> Do we stick with that file format forever? is it perfect and never to >> be changed? > > would it be fair to ask a the same question from a little > different perspective? > > could someone explain what the disadvantages and problems > with 9fat are? =A0i'm asking out of ignorance, since 9fat hasn't > been a problem for me. > That it is too complicated to pares in 512 bytes. --=20 - curiosity sKilled the cat