From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <5a377994acef744dd4fd1e71bae22fe5@terzarima.net>
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net>
Date: Sat,  7 Aug 2010 22:28:19 +0100
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=+ndHJZLov6hcH=pReLm2KYWEYCkHA3e7MhZ3E@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Async clunk?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 45bac40c-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

close must be synchronous, unless you aim for NFS semantics.
plan 9 will hand the work to a service process [only] when a process is interrupted by a note
during a closefgrp (eg, when a file-group is closed when a process exits), to allow
deadlocks to be broken (by a note), or to compensate for dead servers, not to improve latency.