From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <5ad44792c13999bd8d17fcbc990f948f@9netics.com>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 17:45:47 -0700
From: Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com>
In-Reply-To: <13426df10805161138p3da66df3xc4377ade7e9549a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] drawterm and linux
Topicbox-Message-UUID: aa92a80c-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


it is a bit faster for me, but i'm not sure if it's the same version as yours:

cpue% time cp tex.iso /dev/null
0.04u 2.00s 27.10r 	 cp tex.iso /dev/null

cpue% time fcp tex.iso /mnt/term/dev/null		# Windows dt
0.15u 17.70s 16.38r 	 fcp tex.iso /mnt/term/dev/null
cpue% time fcp tex.iso /mnt/term/tmp			# Windows dt
0.11u 17.91s 20.03r 	 fcp tex.iso /mnt/term/tmp

cpue% time fcp tex.iso /mnt/term/dev/null		# Linux dt
0.13u 17.41s 16.28r 	 fcp tex.iso /mnt/term/dev/null
cpue% time fcp tex.iso /mnt/term/home/fst/xfer	# Linux dt
0.14u 17.72s 16.59r 	 fcp tex.iso /mnt/term/home/fst/xfer

cpue% ls -s tex.iso
178584 tex.iso
cpue% dc
178584
2.00
/ p
89292	# 89MB/s for local copy
178584
17.70
/ p
10089	# 10MB/s for remote copy

> something seems not quite right. Or maybe I'm just missing something.
>
> in drawterm,
> fcp (or cp) xyz /mnt/term/tmp
> is now running at about 5 kilobits/sec. That is not a typo.
>
> I'm must wondering if anyone else is seeing this kind of performance.
> I'm seeing from a very recent copy from swtch.com, but I'm not sure if
> it is
> a foulup on my current network or drawterm. In all other ways drawterm
> is quite peppy.
>
> thanks
>
> ron