From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <5af1d5df70fcd04750009e3a6ab68998@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:11:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <599f06db0806270710j39af4d7v521e16740df81907@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c793d480-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>> Did only the 9 kernel need modifications or did the applications
>> binaries need to be recompiled as well?
>>
[...]
>
> 9vx requires no host kernel modifications or
> special privileges, and it runs unmodified
> plan9 386 binaries.

but that doesn't answer the question.  the plan 9
kernel was modified.  how else would it provide
access to the host's fs?

- erik