9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] factotum/802.1x catch 22?
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 06:19:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d375e920703212219x24f97f29gbdfc1745eb9de405@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9321241f7154cd4cd7fab6579c8916b0@proxima.alt.za>

> *** Off Topic ***
>
> I had a brief chat with "patch" and it strikes me now that the delay
> in accepting complex patches might be alleviated if such patches could
> be reviewed by 9fans, that is to say, publicly, by request.  Say, for
> example, that we are asked to comment on Axel's patch and we return a
> verdict, as part of the "patch" process.  No need to publish the
> request, those interested can look on sources and post the result
> there.

That was precisely the purpose of my original patch notification
system, which russ didn't like and forced me to shut down.

I proposed doing a similar thing in the plan9-changes list for whoever
wanted to participate, but russ didn't like that either.

If you like I can open up plan9-changes (I'm not sure, but I suspect
it doesn't track new patches anymore, but that could be easily
changed), or we could create a new plan9-patches where only new
patches are posted (patches would get posted to plan9-changes when
they are accepted or rejected.)

In any case, without the collaboration of whoever sits at the other
end of patch(1), the whole exercise is pointless.

uriel


  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-22  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-19 13:47 Axel Belinfante
2007-03-20 13:44 ` erik quanstrom
2007-03-21 23:03 ` Axel Belinfante
2007-03-22  4:38   ` lucio
2007-03-22  5:19     ` Uriel [this message]
2007-03-22  6:13       ` Noah Evans
2007-03-22  9:11     ` erik quanstrom
2007-03-22 15:31       ` Joel C. Salomon
2007-03-25 11:56     ` Axel Belinfante
2007-03-25 12:12       ` Uriel
2007-03-25 14:48         ` lucio
2007-03-25 20:38           ` Charles Forsyth
2007-03-26  6:51             ` lucio
2007-03-27  9:24               ` Charles Forsyth
2007-03-27 17:29                 ` lucio
2007-03-25 15:40         ` erik quanstrom
2007-03-25 16:44           ` lucio
2007-03-25 20:15           ` Axel Belinfante
2007-03-25 14:46       ` lucio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5d375e920703212219x24f97f29gbdfc1745eb9de405@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=uriel99@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).