From: Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] bell-labs website and plan9
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:41:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d375e920704091741m73bf3dacnb0f28c2a58ab0647@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5efb0db6fba0c2dc536240f5d82185ef@coraid.com>
One word: latency.
By the way, is anyone working on the solutions to the latency problem
we discussed at IWP9? I know nemo has a somewhat different solution
with OP but I still would like to see something backwards compatible
with existing 9P.
uriel
On 4/10/07, erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com> wrote:
> i don't understand why ssh "using a seperate protocol" implies that it should
> be significantly faster than 9p. could you explain why you think this?
>
> On Mon Apr 9 19:27:33 EDT 2007, bsdaemon@comcast.net wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:22:27AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
> > >My take is that bringing in mercurial, and then using mercurial with
> > >mounted file systems, instead of ssh, would be quite neat. And, we are
> > >close to having it.
> >
> > I'd think that it would be practically a no-op, but I'm not sure of hg's
> > locking semantics. I'd say that it would be a very good idea to support
> > cpu and ssh, though, since ssh uses a separate protocol which should be
> > significantly faster than just doing the work over 9P. Again, I'm not
> > sure of the details.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-10 0:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-05 19:45 pedro henrique antunes de oliveira
2007-04-05 21:15 ` John Floren
2007-04-05 21:56 ` W B Hacker
2007-04-05 21:57 ` geoff
2007-04-09 14:24 ` Benn Newman
2007-04-09 14:50 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2007-04-09 14:55 ` erik quanstrom
2007-04-09 15:08 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2007-04-09 15:24 ` erik quanstrom
2007-04-09 15:40 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2007-04-09 15:01 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2007-04-09 15:22 ` ron minnich
2007-04-09 15:30 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2007-04-09 18:02 ` ron minnich
2007-04-09 18:11 ` geoff
2007-04-09 18:14 ` andrey mirtchovski
2007-04-09 21:04 ` ron minnich
2007-04-09 22:01 ` Paweł Lasek
2007-04-09 23:26 ` Kris Maglione
2007-04-10 0:14 ` ron minnich
2007-04-10 0:15 ` erik quanstrom
2007-04-10 0:41 ` Uriel [this message]
2007-04-10 7:57 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2007-04-10 1:08 ` Kris Maglione
2007-04-09 15:50 ` Russ Cox
2007-04-09 16:18 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2007-04-09 16:46 ` matt
2007-04-09 17:51 ` Russ Cox
2007-04-09 17:07 ` Uriel
2007-04-09 17:11 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2007-04-09 17:32 ` Uriel
2007-04-09 18:03 ` ron minnich
2007-04-09 18:07 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2007-04-09 23:03 ` Christopher Nielsen
2007-04-09 23:41 ` [9fans] CA Bay Area Plan9 users group Lawrence E. Bakst
[not found] ` <p0624081ec2407f2acfe8@192.168.0.7>
2007-04-10 0:12 ` ron minnich
2007-04-10 21:31 ` Roman Shaposhnick
2007-04-10 22:23 ` Micah Stetson
2007-04-10 23:32 ` ron minnich
2007-04-11 8:52 ` Lawrence E. Bakst
[not found] ` <p06240831c241dbdd8043@192.168.0.7>
2007-04-11 11:56 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-04-11 15:20 ` ron minnich
2007-04-12 4:56 ` Joel Franusic
2007-04-12 15:31 ` ron minnich
2007-04-13 22:34 ` David Hendricks
2007-04-13 23:36 ` ron minnich
2007-04-14 22:48 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2007-04-15 0:16 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2007-04-15 1:37 ` Joel C. Salomon
2007-04-15 1:51 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2007-04-15 1:52 ` Christopher Nielsen
2007-04-16 9:23 ` [9fans] " David Hendricks
2007-04-16 17:08 ` Joel Franusic
2007-04-17 7:21 ` David Hendricks
2007-04-17 8:40 ` Uriel
2007-04-17 9:08 ` Christopher Nielsen
2007-04-17 9:08 ` Christopher Nielsen
2007-04-17 9:27 ` Uriel
2007-04-25 0:12 ` David Hendricks
2007-04-30 0:01 ` David Hendricks
2007-04-30 13:34 ` Uriel
2007-04-30 18:05 ` David Hendricks
2007-04-30 19:43 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2007-04-30 23:04 ` David Hendricks
2007-04-30 23:45 ` David Leimbach
2007-05-10 3:07 ` David Hendricks
2007-05-11 15:17 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2007-05-11 16:06 ` David Hendricks
2007-05-11 16:09 ` Tim Wiess
2007-05-11 16:17 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2007-05-11 16:40 ` Joel C. Salomon
2007-05-11 18:24 ` David Hendricks
2007-04-17 4:20 ` Vester Thacker
2007-04-17 4:46 ` ron minnich
2007-04-17 5:54 ` Christopher Nielsen
2007-04-17 21:19 ` Roman Shaposhnick
2007-04-10 1:17 ` [9fans] " Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan
2007-04-10 2:56 ` Anthony Sorace
2007-04-05 21:27 ` [9fans] bell-labs website and plan9 W B Hacker
2007-04-05 21:33 ` pedro henrique antunes de oliveira
2007-04-05 21:49 ` Fazlul Shahriar
2007-04-05 21:51 ` pedro henrique antunes de oliveira
2007-04-09 15:32 erik quanstrom
2007-04-09 15:44 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2007-04-09 16:15 ` Martin Neubauer
2007-04-09 16:23 erik quanstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d375e920704091741m73bf3dacnb0f28c2a58ab0647@mail.gmail.com \
--to=uriel99@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).