From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <5d375e920704120814x7df5749sd7b8524972878a85@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:14:08 +0200
From: Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
In-Reply-To: <5247962e2f1f11c9b374c57d9a9a71db@cat-v.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <5247962e2f1f11c9b374c57d9a9a71db@cat-v.org>
Subject: [9fans] Re: [sources] 20070410: % cat
	>/sys/lib/dist/changes/1176262206.1.txt << EOF
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 454b290c-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>           # uncomment the following for booting other systems
>           #ip/dhcpd
>           #ip/tftpd

Shouldn't optional stuff like this go in cpurc.local anyway?

>         + #if(! netstat -n | grep -v 17008 | grep -s il.*Listen)
>         + #     aux/listen -q il
[...]
>         + # cpu specific startup
>         + #if(test -e /cfg/$sysname/cpustart)
>         + #     . /cfg/$sysname/cpustart
>         +
>         + #echo `{date} $sysname >>/sys/log/boot

Why is all this commented out?

This changes seem to intend to allow local installations to override
the default cpurc setup without having to edit it (and therefore get
out of sync with sources and need to merge future changes by hand and
so on), so I see little reason to leave 'alternative' sections
commented out when the local and $sysname specific scripts can take
care of that.

And thanks dho for writing the summaries! Just one small complaint,
could you fix the first line of the comments (specially because it is
used by convention as subject for the emails)?

Best wishes

uriel