From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <5d375e920709031254m2a544410n7db7ef32808ee43@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon,  3 Sep 2007 21:54:13 +0200
From: Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan 9 overcommits memory?
In-Reply-To: <14907977b9922655ca04fb969bab2297@terzarima.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <5d375e920709031246r1cabfddelae87cd03d6904e91@mail.gmail.com>
	<14907977b9922655ca04fb969bab2297@terzarima.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b65c3eb0-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Can't find out for sure until someone fixes it :))

One more reason IMHO why we are best off having it disabled, so when
things freeze we know it is something else.

Best wishes

uriel

On 9/3/07, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
> > The current swap just frustrates people who expect it to work, and
> > then have their systems freeze randomly. Maybe by disabling/remove
> > swap support, then if someone really needs swap he will fix it first
> > and then we can add it back.
>
> i'm not sure all the random freezes are caused by swap.
> in a way, it would be nice if they were, but i wonder...
>
>