From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <5d375e920709081315r76a229fbmf9ba745c52225b1d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 22:15:18 +0200 From: Uriel To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] The Web9 Project In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6a98877f0437be7ed76be727ab932c42@9netics.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: bbf9d0ee-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > > have you compared its performance to webdav? > > I don't have any numbers with me, but I would expect 9P to work > faster than WebDAV since 9P works one layer below HTTP. > Implementation details aside, header-overhead in itself makes WebDAV > a less of a competitor. Maybe, if you have ridiculously low latency. Which is one of the reasons I would like to see the latency issues addressed, so 9P services can work well over non-LAN networks. Maybe we can finally agree on a solution for this at this year's IWP9? Best wishes uriel