From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <5d375e920711130849w17055023s8c47f3c9b5b5e864@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:49:30 +0100
From: Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Glendix?
In-Reply-To: <f139ec91ab945a62f271c09ffda26137@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <5d375e920711130531i166392f0u254171e1b13ab36b@mail.gmail.com>
	<f139ec91ab945a62f271c09ffda26137@quanstro.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f7bf69f4-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> i am reminded by a line from the labs' response to ast's usenix posting
>    - UNIX can be successfully run as an application program
>         `Run' perhaps, `successfully' no.  Name a product that succeeds
>         by running UNIX as an application.
>
> s/UNIX/Plan 9/g

I love that post, but I don't think s/UNIX/Plan 9/g is valid, we are
not talking about microkernels here, and see also Inferno.

uriel