From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <5d375e920712210843i651b74f2haf0c5f05bf33a42c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:43:30 -0500
From: Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Abaco: url parsing problem
In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60712210835x59435cf2u491829e049f0ec61@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <acb195480712201322v73a013d0me477c8b6d3569162@mail.gmail.com>
	<e11dec9bd53e81bd03541528f16ec40b@yourdomain.dom>
	<5d375e920712210739j27248993o683fa145a0bdcc8@mail.gmail.com>
	<3e1162e60712210835x59435cf2u491829e049f0ec61@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1fbacc64-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

If you are looking for obnoxiousness and silliness devoid of any
content I recommend you re-read what you just wrote.

Or you could go and write yet another broken and useless url parsing
implementation.

uriel

On Dec 21, 2007 11:35 AM, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Dec 21, 2007 7:39 AM, Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com> wrote:
> > That is why somebody (cough) riped out the url parsing code from webfs
> > and put it into a library, and then updated abaco to use that
> > library... but we all know here code and effort duplication is good,
> > so never mind.
> >
> > uriel
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> One could argue that to the extreme.  I've already got windows?  Why do I
> need another operating system?  I should be happy with my windows, and just
> contribute to that community, that way, all my changes can be viewed and
> used by my fellow windows users.
>
> I mean, if you're going to be pedantic and silly about a concept, why not go
> all the way?
>
> Fragmentation of effort is bad in all cases, or it isn't bad in all cases.
> You can't have both categorically at the same time.
>
> Dave
>