From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <5d375e920801180200i63eff46fi49f35ae144678313@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:00:03 +0100 From: Uriel To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Inferno /sys/doc: PDFs are actually PS? In-Reply-To: <282E2241-61C6-43B4-B851-72BBDE1547F0@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <282E2241-61C6-43B4-B851-72BBDE1547F0@mac.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3128e2d8-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 This has been discussed in the past in the proper place for it: the inferno-list. And no, I don't remember why there are postscript files with .pdf extension, and obviously have no clue why this has not been fixed. uriel On Jan 18, 2008 3:18 AM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote: > Hello. I tried to see the Inferno document "An Overview of Limbo/ > Tk" (inferno_root/doc/limbotk/tk.pdf) with page, and it looks blurry. > So I decided to put it on my Mac OS X, and Adobe Reader didn't open > it. I then found it was a ps file, not a PDF file. Why does Inferno > use the .pdf extension, then? > > PS - I converted the PS to a PDF with Mac OS X and it it still > blurry :-( The Inferno distribution doesn't come with any images so I > can't rebuild from the troff source. > >