From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <5d375e920802040309v626ee945qdf9e274aad2fac23@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon,  4 Feb 2008 13:09:25 +0200
From: Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] A newbie question...
In-Reply-To: <fo2bi9$sv1$1@panix2.panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <942D796B-FE26-43C3-A818-F5797DCB7CD4@mac.com>
	<824de59a4b242b73662cf1ae2b2cbcc2@quintile.net>
	<fo2bi9$sv1$1@panix2.panix.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 437614a6-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Although I keep hearing different stories about the gcc availble for
> Plan 9 (it makes little sense to me to hear "it does not work" because
> something had to be used to compile Plan 9 itself, etc and I figure it's
> not being done as a cross-compiler).

http://doc.cat-v.org/bell_labs/new_c_compilers/ (I don't know the
exact date, but this was probably written in the late 80's)
http://cm.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/compiler.html

But I must be having delusions, because everyone knows there were no C
compilers in the universe before God RMS gave us the Golden GCC.

And of course ken never did anything after writing ed... not that
anyone remembers ed anymore, the other day I found the Debian
installer doesn't have ed... but it has nano! oh joy of progress! and
if the linux tty gets seriously confused, oh, nano is so much more
effective at filling your screen with funny characters!

uriel

> --
> Greg Comeau / 4.3.9 with C++0xisms now in beta!
> Comeau C/C++ ONLINE ==>     http://www.comeaucomputing.com/tryitout
> World Class Compilers:  Breathtaking C++, Amazing C99, Fabulous C90.
> Comeau C/C++ with Dinkumware's Libraries... Have you tried it?
>