From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <5d375e920802172103n3cb898f5m44e96ae80f88ef4c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:03:27 +0100
From: Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions
In-Reply-To: <85BEF2BF-F346-4050-98F6-FB86DFBDFC5E@mac.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <254278ff3375ec25d8a5db25a0d94270@quanstro.net>
	<FABE571A-76D9-40DF-BFC1-4216D26A9721@mac.com>
	<85BEF2BF-F346-4050-98F6-FB86DFBDFC5E@mac.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 58636aa8-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Time to reach for the 92FS...

Dear pietro, if you don't even know that the Plan 9 toolchain *is*
ken's toolchain, and your other comments are totally irrelevant, why
don't you just shut the fuck up?

And this obviously doesn't mean erik was right, brucee as usual hit
every nail straight in the head.

uriel - trying to do a boyd

On Feb 18, 2008 5:46 AM, Pietro Gagliardi <pietro10@mac.com> wrote:
>
> And if you're going to rebut and say that limbo needs dis, then check this
> out:
>
> /n/sources/contrib/andrey/dis.tar.gz (or something)
>
> Also works with the Plan 9 toolchain, but you may need to change some files
> now.
>
>
>
> On Feb 17, 2008, at 11:44 PM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:
>
> One more thing:
>
> On Feb 17, 2008, at 6:58 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>
> porting limbo to a new architecture requires porting ken's toolchain
> and the inferno kernel.
>
> /n/sources/contrib/pietro/limbo.tgz
>
> The only thing ported was the source code and mkfiles.
>
>
>