From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <5d375e920811211343r1773d4a2gde1c186406125206@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:43:00 +0100
From: Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <a560a5d00811211309u311ef239x64ba5fbb9b2a223@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <a560a5d00811211309u311ef239x64ba5fbb9b2a223@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9port
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 50834dac-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Ignore those packages, they are insanely ancient and don't really fit
well with debian's packaging system anyway.

Use a checkout from the hg repo instead, and if you really want, build
your own packages.

uriel

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, (this is probably targeted at Russ Cox...)
>
>
> Why, on
> http://swtch.com/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-i386/Packages
> the description of
> Package: plan9port-bin24
> says
> This package contains binaries for Linux 2.6 and later kernels
> while
> Package: plan9port-bin26
> says
> This package contains binaries for Linux 2.4 and earlier kernels
>
> I would somehow expect it be the other way round...
> So just in case it would be...
> Ruda
> Ruda
>
>