From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <5d375e920812171432q57dd7149hb0582dd856c830e5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:32:46 +0100
From: Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <13426df10812171428n1efffb8ewb7863648d24f5933@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <13426df10812171428n1efffb8ewb7863648d24f5933@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] This is classic.
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 65476bec-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

D-bus, a disgrace that should never have even been invented, if 9P on
linux had not been dead-on-arrival.

uriel


On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:28 PM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
> For no reason that I can see I am now getting this message via a dialogue box:
> Packagekit Error
> Failed to reset get-updates
>
> Then a little box I can tick for more data.
>
> Here's where it really gets good:
> A security policy in place prevents this sender from sending this
> message to this recipient, see message bus configuration file
> (rejected message had interface
> "org.freedesktop.PackageKit.Transaction" member "Cancel" error name
> "(unset)" destination "org.freedesktop.PackageKit")
>
> Neat. Lots of this. So. just WTF could this all mean? It means dbus hell.
>
> It's amazing to think of the amount of labor that could produce
> something like this. And people claim Plan 9 is obscure?
>
> ron
>
>