9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com>
To: lucio@proxima.alt.za,
	"Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] directly opening Plan9 devices
Date: Sun,  4 Jan 2009 14:01:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d375e920901040501pb75aceat3129486817f8cbb1@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d22433c53465761de8474fa94c216a84@proxima.alt.za>

As I read it, rob seems to disagree with you:

> # file names were just a hack to get started - literally to get started.
They were a place holder until a better idea came along.  None has.
>
> # was never considered a great idea; I just needed some way to
name an unnamed resource.  I deliberately chose # as the character
because it's the comment character in the shell and therefore is
really irritating to use.

http://9fans.net/archive/2003/02/832

Still, clearly to this day nobody has come up with a fully
satisfactory design to replace #, and certainly not an implementation
of any such design.

Seems that despite the many years of thinking, this is still a tricky
problem, and # has turned out to be 'good enough' to keep any
alternative from appearing.

Peace

uriel

On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 12:41 PM,  <lucio@proxima.alt.za> wrote:
>> No one has yet offered a working, cleaner idea.
>
> I think it is a working, perfectly clean idea, myself.  It's a
> namespace of its own and there are only a very few inconsistencies
> within it, well justified by the very nature of the namespace.  That
> minor nits such as #s and #| being a bit off the paradigm apply
> suggests that some aspects could be given more thought, but they do
> not invalidate the usefulness and consistency of the design.  Rather,
> they show a surprising maturity for something that probably did not
> get too many iterations.
>
> ++L
>
>
>



  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-04 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-03 21:44 Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-03 21:46 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-03 21:56   ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-03 22:03     ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-03 22:40       ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-03 22:46         ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2009-01-03 22:56           ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-04  5:00             ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-04  5:40               ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-04  4:58           ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-03 22:57         ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-03 23:15           ` Russ Cox
2009-01-03 23:17             ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-04  5:07             ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-04  5:05           ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-03 22:21     ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2009-01-03 22:40       ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-04  5:12       ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-04  5:27         ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-04  5:39           ` lucio
2009-01-04  5:42             ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-05  0:52           ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-05  6:21             ` Roman Zhukov
2009-01-05 11:00             ` Charles Forsyth
2009-01-06  5:02               ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-01-06 14:17                 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-07 16:55                   ` ron minnich
2009-01-07 17:16                     ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-08  5:13                       ` ron minnich
2009-01-08 13:37                         ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-08 14:03                           ` Charles Forsyth
2009-01-08 15:36                           ` ron minnich
2009-01-08 15:44                             ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-08 17:34                             ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-08 17:35                             ` Charles Forsyth
2009-01-08  7:45                     ` Dave Eckhardt
2009-01-08 17:43                     ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-08 23:30                   ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-04  7:01         ` Russ Cox
2009-01-04 11:41           ` lucio
2009-01-04 13:01             ` Uriel [this message]
2009-01-04 13:16               ` lucio
2009-01-05  0:41           ` Roman V. Shaposhnik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5d375e920901040501pb75aceat3129486817f8cbb1@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=uriel99@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    --cc=lucio@proxima.alt.za \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).