Re: [9fans] Strange rc bug for the 9fans bug-squashing squad

[Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com>]

Thanks martin for your analysis, this makes some sense to me, but as I
pointed out, even setting ifs to () doesn't solve the issue, so it
would be nice to find a solution to this.

Right now having the output of `{} corrupted can be quite inconvenient...

Thanks

uriel

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Martin Neubauer <m.ne@gmx.net> wrote:
> On second thought (and in the light of Geoffs reply) I probably won't.
> If you do care, the following change to the loop in question will at
> least preserve all input:
>
>                while((c = rchr(f))!=EOF){
>                        if(strchr(stop, c)){
>                                if(s!=wd){
>                                        *s='\0';
>                                        v = newword(wd, v);
>                                        s = wd;
>                                }
>                        }
>                        else if(s==ewd){
>                                *s='\0';
>                                v = newword(wd, v);
>                                s = wd;
>                                *s++=c;
>                        }
>                        else *s++=c;
>                }
>
> With a dynamic buffer the tokenisation could be prevented, but in your
> example the lexical scanner would quite likely bail afterwards.  (I
> remember a discussion some time ago about this.)
>
>