From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6cd8cfefe4d2d075ed4f5220f17f8482@vitanuova.com> References: <6cd8cfefe4d2d075ed4f5220f17f8482@vitanuova.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:48:29 +0200 Message-ID: <5d375e920907281648l4c63479an9e72c1ea0328c279@mail.gmail.com> From: Uriel To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] Someone let the domain go Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3087020e-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:41 PM, C H Forsyth wrote: > I've no idea why the current owners of that domain name bother > to keep it registered. Perhaps there's a little back story there; > I don't know. Likely Google juice, there are still plenty of high-rank links pointing there lying around the net. That and probably the amount of mistaken ad clicks are enough to cover their registration fees, so why would they let it go? uriel > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From:=C2=A0akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net > To:=C2=A09fans@9fans.net > Date:=C2=A0Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:08:08 -0700 > Subject:=C2=A0Re: [9fans] Someone let the domain go > Yes, apparently as far back as March/April of 2001. > > don't ask me why I know > ak > >