From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <5d70bc7a871d4ee7f5614c48a1a42dae@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] ramfs, lib9p
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org>
In-Reply-To: <408e8452$1@pfaff2.ethz.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:18:32 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6f8a9590-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> I noticed that there are two ramfs implementations:
> /sys/src/cmd/ramfs.c    seems old, because does not use lib9p
> /sys/src/lib9p/ramfs.c  seems newer, because does use lib9p

Surprisingly, the one I'm using is the old one, as reported by src.